ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Teacher and Leader Workforce

Quick Definition

For years research has shown the quality of the teacher workforce to be the single most influential school-based factor impacting student achievement.  Improving our public schools and increasing student success depends upon the ready supply of well-qualified, professional, and effective teachers at all levels of the public education system.  Quality teachers are not simply born; they are developed and supported by the schools and communities in which they work.  Thus, the working conditions under which teachers practice their profession and the supports they are provided to do their work effectively and grow professionally are essential components of a quality teacher workforce.1

As a policy issue, teacher workforce encompasses a broad array of critical subtopics: preparation and education; certification and licensure; mentoring and induction; recruitment and retention; compensation and professional growth; and quality and evaluation.


1 Center for Teaching Quality. “Why Teaching Quality Matters: What We Know.” Retrieved from http://www.teachingquality.org/whytqmatters/whatweknow.htm

Relevancy to Georgia

Overview

Ensuring that public schools are staffed with a quality teacher workforce is a central educational policy issue around the world.  A recent study of 25 school systems throughout the world—including 10 of the top performers—corroborated the resounding conclusion of nearly every educational research and policy organization in the United States.  The experiences of top school systems suggests that “three things matter most: 1) getting the right people to become teachers, 2) developing them into effective instructors and, 3) ensuring that the system is able to deliver the best possible instruction for every child.”1

Despite steps taken in recent years to improve policies impacting the teacher profession, evidence suggests that Georgia’s policymakers must not only renew, but intensify their commitment to bring the necessary level of quality to the teacher workforce in our state.  According to the National Council on Teacher Quality, the overall status of Georgia’s statewide policies in the area of teacher quality showed “Moderate Progress”—earning Georgia a “C” grade for our workforce.2  The future actions that Georgia educators and lawmakers take to address teacher quality will impact not only the members of our state’s educator workforce, but the hundreds of thousands of children served in Georgia’s public schools.

Teacher Demographics in Georgia

In 2011, a total of 131,711 educators were employed in Georgia’s PK-12 public school system. Included in this workforce group were instructional teachers, administrators, education support staff, and student services personnel.  Student enrollment is the primary factor influencing the size of the teacher workforce.  Although student enrollment in Georgia’s public schools has increased in recent years, the number of teachers in 2009-10 and 2010-2011 actually decreased.  As states continue to grapple with cuts to education, these trends may continue through the upcoming school year.  Figure 1 shows the change in Georgia’s number of certified personnel alongside the growth in student enrollment.

 

Table 1 shows the distribution of Georgia’s public school teachers by grade level.  As 50.2 percent of the total teacher workforce, elementary school teachers comprise the largest personnel category. 

 

Teacher Preparation and Education

Teaching is a complex task that requires an extensive body of knowledge and skills.  For example, quality teachers must master not only their subject matter, but also know how to organize and deliver lessons, how to assess students’ progress and refine instruction to meet the needs of diverse learners, and how to work well with parents and colleagues. Teacher preparation and education refers to the educational program—whether through a four-year university or an alternative setting—through which individuals obtain the skills and knowledge necessary to enter the teacher workforce.

In Georgia, teacher preparation and education may occur in a traditional university setting or through an alternative preparation program.  The approval of professional programs for educator preparation is the responsibility of the Georgia Professional Standards Commission (PSC). 

The most common route to becoming a teacher is the traditional one: an individual enters a baccalaureate degree program at a college or university.  Approved programs may be housed at either a private or public educational institution.  In Georgia, 19 public colleges and universities offer teacher preparation programs. College of Coastal Georgia, Georgia Gwinnett College, and Middle Georgia College have programs under development.4  The state allows for prospective teachers to join the profession even if they didn’t get a college degree in education.

Educator preparation programs designed for college graduates or mid-career professionals are known as “non-traditional” or “alternative” programs. In Georgia, alternative programs are offered through the Georgia Teacher Alternative Preparation Program® (Georgia TAPP). Georgia TAPP offers classroom-based teacher preparation for individuals who have the basic qualifications to teach early childhood, middle-grades, secondary, or P-12 education, but have not completed a teacher preparation program.  Georgia TAPP program providers include colleges, universities, Regional Education Service Agencies (RESAs), or Local Education Agencies (LEAs) approved by the Georgia Professional Standards Commission (PSC).  Currently, there are twenty-one Georgia TAPP providers and six One Year Supervised Practicum (OYSP) Providers.5

Two training programs that are expanding are Teach For America (TFA) and The New Teacher Project (NTP).  The main goal of TFA is to ensure that children growing up in poverty obtain the same quality education that their wealthier peers receive.  They recruit recent college graduates to teach for two years in low-income urban and rural areas.  When choosing between applicants, TFA looks for those who have “strong leadership potential” and who will help bring diversity to the corps—which is needed for the many diverse schools.6  They nurture and train these teachers to become leaders who will go on to make a difference in students’ lives.  TFA has 43 branches across the country including a metro Atlanta site, and had 9,000 participants in 2011-2012.7   

The New Teacher Project is similar to TFA in that both want to put great teachers in schools that need them most.  NTP is arguably stricter about its process, however.  In 2011 for instance, only nine percent of applicants were accepted into the Teaching Fellows Program.  Those without an education degree are catered to by NTP, with rigorous pre-service and classroom training.  After a year of teaching in the program, principal evaluations are taken and an analysis of student growth is completed by NTP.  According to NTP:  “Only teachers who are at least as effective as the average new teacher in their district will earn certification, and remain in the classroom.”8  NTP is active in 17 states including Georgia—where they have programs in Atlanta, Augusta, and Columbus.

The certification and licensing of teachers is a subject of great importance to states as they strive to reach the “Highly Qualified” teacher standards as determined by the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB).  This is one aspect of the law that was not included in the waiver Georgia received from the U.S Department of Education in February.  In recognizing the effectiveness and long-term student benefits of well-trained teachers, states are moving away from allowing teachers to hold temporary and emergency licenses. Some states offer specialized pathways or alternative licensure for career-changers to expedite the initial certification process.  Many states have reviewed how they measure teacher content knowledge, resulting in some states changing or improving their testing requirements.9

Routes to Educator Certification in Georgia

In Georgia, the Professional Standards Commission (PSC) holds the responsibility for providing a regulatory system for certifying and classifying professional employees in public schools. State certification provides a standardized base-level of professional knowledge and skills for the educators working in public schools. Like many other states, Georgia has adopted a combination of individualized requirements and some commonly used standards developed by the National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification (NASDTEC).10

Just as educator preparation programs in Georgia are varied to fit the needs of diverse individuals, so are there multiple routes to teacher certification in the state. Table 2 outlines the different routes to educator certification in Georgia.

In addition to obtaining the requisite certificate for teaching in a Georgia public school, educators in the state may elect to pursue additional, advanced certificates that represent a higher level of professionalism and skill in the teaching field.  One such certificate, the Georgia Master Teacher Certificate, is offered at the state level.  Another, the National Board Certificate is offered through a nationally-administered program.  

Georgia Master Teacher Certification Program

In 2005, the Georgia General Assembly passed legislation to establish the Georgia Master Teacher Certification Program. This program provides statewide recognition to Georgia public school teachers with at least three years of experience who demonstrate excellence in the classroom that is linked to gains in student achievement.  Teachers who meet the criteria for Master Teacher Certification will create the pool for state-funded Academic Coaches.  The program is implemented as a partnership effort of the Professional Standards Commission, the Governor’s Office of Student Achievement, and the Georgia Department of Education.   In the first six years of the program (2006-2011), 687 teachers throughout the state have achieved the designation of Master Teacher Certification.

National Board Certification of Teachers

In addition to fulfilling state-level requirements for certification and licensure, teachers may voluntarily apply to earn National Board Certification (NBC) from the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.  Like board-certified doctors, accountants, and architects, teachers who achieve NBC have met rigorous criteria through intensive study, self-assessment, evaluation, and peer review.  Many NBC teachers report that the process of becoming certified, which includes developing and submitting a portfolio recording their teaching practice, is a substantial professional learning opportunity.  Historically, NBC teachers received an annual bonus for their accomplishment.

In 2009, HB 243 amended Georgia Code stating that NBCT salary increases were subject to appropriation by the General Assembly.11  Therefore, if the legislature determines there is no room in the budget for these funds, these teachers will not receive their raise.

Recruitment and Retention

The teacher shortage varies in intensity between states and within districts.  Although economic problems have led to a loss of teachers in many districts, the teacher shortage remains a concern for disadvantaged areas, including high minority, high poverty, and high rural areas, and for certain subject areas such as math, science, special education, and foreign languages.  To recruit and retain teachers, many systems offer incentives which can be granted in a number of ways including tuition reimbursements, signing bonuses, and salary adjustments.  Not all districts, however, can afford to make such offers.  Recruitment and retention of educators is of critical importance in order to increase student performance, provide quality education, and help close the achievement gap.  In many states, incentives are offered to teachers and teacher candidates who agree to teach in high-need schools in return for multi-year commitments to remain in the school and in the teaching profession.12

In Georgia, the retention of teachers from one year to the next continues to be the major contributor of teachers to the classroom. The majority of Georgia’s teachers remain in the classroom each year.  Figure 2 illustrates the decline in retention for a cohort over the course of eleven years.  

There is often much worry regarding the problem of teacher turnover.  While it is a concern, the problem isn’t as large as some assume. This misunderstanding occurs because of the way people read and understand statistics, as well as how data is collected. The traditional method of measuring teacher retention is flawed for two reasons:  it doesn’t consider career transitions inside public education or teachers returning to the classroom after a brief sabbatical.  Figure 2 shows the difference that altering measurements can have on the retention rate.  There is a common notion that about half of all new teachers will leave teaching after five years.13  More recently it has been discovered that the retention rate is slightly better than earlier results showed.  In this sample, the retention rate in Georgia was 74.7 percent at year five.

Mentoring and Induction

The terms induction and mentoring have become synonymous in most states and school districts across the country.  Although used interchangeably, they actually have different meanings, both of which are equally important in retaining new and beginning teachers.  Induction programs offer a wider support system than mentoring alone by providing guidance and introduction to a position as well as help in curriculum planning, evaluation, professional development, and mentoring.  Mentoring or coaching includes one-on-one support and feedback by an experienced, veteran teacher to a novice teacher resulting in increased skills and confidence necessary for success in the teaching profession.14

It is within the first few years of actual teaching in the classroom that teachers can become accomplished professionals. A 2004 research study shows that teachers who participate in an induction program are twice as likely to remain in teaching. Participation not only benefits and has a positive effect on the inexperienced, but on the experienced teachers as well.15

As part of the Race To The Top (RT3) initiative, a statewide Induction Task Force has been in development since June 2011 to develop a high-level draft of induction guidelines for teachers and for principals.16  One of the main focuses of this program is to “ensure effective teachers stay in the classroom and ineffective teachers are supported to either become effective teachers or are to be counseled out of the classroom,” according to the Georgia Department of Education.  There are seven areas for high-quality teacher induction: 1) Roles and Responsibilities; 2) Leadership and Organizational Structures; 3) Orientation; 4) Mentoring; 5) Ongoing Assessment; 6) Professional Learning; and 7) Program Evaluation.  These guidelines will be finalized in the summer of 2012.

Compensation and Professional Growth

Crafting the best policies for teacher compensation sits near the top of any education policy agenda year after year. While base salaries remain at the heart of any discussion of teacher pay, an effective policy discussion of teacher compensation goes far beyond just salaries. It involves increasingly diverse avenues of compensation that include one-time or sustained incentives, retirement packages, benefits, and more.17

Georgia is in the process of transitioning away from the old system where teachers are compensated based on years of service and educational attainment.  Georgia is developing a common evaluation system that will allow consistency and comparability across districts, based on a common definition of teacher and leader effectiveness.18   The evaluation system will create a single Teacher Effectiveness Measure (TEM) that will be generated by the Teacher Keys Evaluation System.

The Teacher Keys Evaluation System combines three primary components (See Figure 3): 

1)Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards (TAPS), which combine the use of classroom observations, walkthroughs, and lesson plans and teacher portfolios, to provide teachers constructive feedback across a variety of domains such as planning, instructional delivery, assessment, learning environment, and professionalism and communication;

2)The Surveys of Instructional Practice, which will include student surveys that ask questions along the same five domains as the TAPS; and

3)Student Growth and Academic Achievement, which will take into account student growth/ value added models.

 

Georgia will use the TEM system to inform all personnel decisions: professional development, compensation, promotion, retention, recertification, and interventions and dismissals.   Higher performing teachers will have higher earning potential.  Under RT3, it is proposed that increases in the salary schedule will be tied to performance, and every five years teachers must achieve a required TEM threshold as part of the recertification process.19

To formalize career advancement, under RT3, the state is also developing a new career ladder.  Georgia is still in the early stages of developing their career ladder, but its purpose is to develop teacher capacity.  Figure 4 illustrates a proposed Career Ladder Guidelines under the new system and articulates how the relationship between TEM scores and career pay and trajectory could be related.

 

The RT3 evaluation system began piloting in more than 500 schools within the state’s twenty-six RT3 school districts in January 2012.   The system will be rolled out to all schools in the RT3 districts for the 2012-2013 school year, with plans to expand up to sixty new districts a year after that.20

School Leadership

Today, school leadership may be more important than at any other time in history.  Demographic, social, and technological changes are producing new challenges for states, school districts, and schools working to strengthen educational systems and improve student success.  Our schools desperately need leaders who understand the social, economic, and political forces that influence education, who embrace new models of instructional leadership, and who are committed to the challenges of school leadership.21

Yet recent studies of school leadership policies and preparation suggest that states are not doing enough to ensure that leaders are trained to effectively lead positive educational change.  A 2005 research report revealed that only two percent of the course content in university principal preparation programs addressed accountability in the context of school improvement.  Additionally, two-thirds of schools of education were “out of touch” with the skills they need to succeed on the job.22

In Georgia, policymakers have recognized the importance of strengthening school leadership preparation.  The state has taken great strides over recent years to strengthen leadership preparation programs and build the supply of well-qualified school leaders.  It is important that new mentoring and induction strategies focus on principals as well, because the average tenure is only 3.5 years.23  Georgia’s population continues to grow, leading to greater student enrollment.  New schools continue to open and need bright and able principals to start them on a path to success.  As mentioned above, the Induction Task Force will include principals as well.  A successful and effective principal “creates a culture of high expectations not only for student learning, but for adult learning.”24  The same way that teacher instability can affect children’s learning environment, principal instability can affect how teachers grow as professionals. School leaders will also be evaluated using a system similar to teachers.  A Leadership Effectiveness Measure Score will be generated using observed and data sources that illuminate their leadership ability.

Georgia has implemented a significant initiative, Georgia Leadership Institute for School Improvement (GLISI), which strengthens school leadership preparation, recruitment, retention, and quality.  GLISI began operation in 2002 as a partnership devoted to the success of Georgia’s educational leaders in meeting elevated expectations for student achievement and school performance.  The partnership is comprised of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia (USG), the Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education (GPEE), the Georgia Professional Standards Commission (PSC), the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE), the office of the Governor, K-12 educators, and business leaders.

In order to provide school leaders in Georgia with effective, research-based education and support, GLISI also collaborates with the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB), Georgia’s Regional Education Service Agencies (RESAs), school system professional development departments, higher education institutions, the Georgia School Superintendents Association (GSSA), the Georgia School Boards Association (GSBA), and others who seek to develop and support school leaders. 

The goal of this coordinated effort is to provide resources and leverage collaboration to increase the quality and amount of support provided to educational leaders.  GLISI provides education and development for educational leaders, and works to research, define, and institutionalize a leadership model based on best practices for the work of leadership of school improvement to drive changes in culture and behavior and sustain school improvement.  Additionally, GLISI works to influence policy to establish new processes for leader recruitment, selection, preparation, development, and retention based on best practices that support school improvement.


1 McKinsey and Company, How the World’s Best-performing School Systems Come Out on Top (September 2007).

2 National Council on Teacher Quality, State Teacher Policy Yearbook: Progress on Teacher Quality (Washington, D.C., 2011).

3 Center for Teaching Quality, “Teacher Preparation,” Retrieved from http://www.teachingquality.org/relatedtqissues/preparation.htm

4 University System of Georgia.“Educator Preparation.”Updated July 6, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.usg.edu/educator_prep/preparation

5 http://www.gapsc.com/EducatorPreparation/GaTapp/home.asp

6  Teachforamerica.org/why-teach-for-america/who-we-look-for

7 Teachforamerica.org/our-organization

8  tntp.org/what-we-do/training/tntp-academy

9 Education Commission of the States. “Teacher Quality: Certification and Licensure.” Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org.

10 Georgia Professional Standards Commission, “Educator Certification Section.” Retrieved from http://www.gapsc.com/TeacherCertification.asp

11 Georgia Professional Standards Commission

12 Education Commission of the States. “Teacher Quality: Recruitment and Retention.” Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org.

13 National Center for Education Statistics.“Unraveling the “Teacher Shortage” Problem: Teacher Retention is the Key.”  2002.

14 Education Commission of the States.“Teaching Quality: Induction Programs and Mentoring.”Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org.

15 Education Commission of the States.“Teaching Quality: Induction Programs and Mentoring.” Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org; Center for Teaching Quality. “Why Mentoring and Induction Matters and What Must Be Done for New Teachers.” Best Practices and Policies: Teaching Quality Around the Nation (Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2006).

16 Georgia Department of Education.http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/Teacher-and-Leader-Effectiveness/Pages/Teacher-and-Principal-Induction-Guidelines-.aspx

17 Education Commission of the States.“Teaching Quality: Compensation and Diversified Pay Systems.”Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org.

18 Georgia Department of Education.“Great Teachers and Leaders.”  www.doek12.ga.us/RT3.aspx

19 Ibid.

20 Georgia Department of Education. 2011. “Teacher Keys Evaluation System and Leader Keys Evaluation System.” Presented at Race to the Top Summit, October 24, 2011.  Athens, GA.

21 Education Commission of the States.“Leadership.”  Retrieved from www.ecs.org

22 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.“School Leadership.”  Retrieved from www.nga.org

23 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), "Public School Principal Data File," 2007-2008

24 Georgia Department of Education.“Principal Induction Draft Guidelines Introduction.” September 30, 2011

 

The National Perspective

In the 2010-2011 school year, the average salary for a classroom teacher in Georgia was $52,815—the highest of any other southeastern state-- though lower than the national average of $55,623.1  Figure 6 illustrates the trend in administrator and teacher salary averages for the past five years.  Administrator salaries began to decline in the 2009-10 school year and continued to fall the following year.  Teacher salaries slightly dropped in 2010-11.

The national average has consistently risen each year since 1990 and has generally risen along with inflation.2  The nation did not see a decrease in salary the way Georgia has, but there was a leveling off from 2010 to 2011.  Including Georgia, 12 states either kept salaries stagnant or decreased salaries from 2010 to 2011.3  In 2008, the national average for administrator salaries was $83,880.4  In summary, for the past few years Georgia was above the national average for administrator salary, but below the national average for teacher salary.

The ratio of students to teachers is often used as an alternative to classroom size.  Education analysts keep track of classroom size because intuitively, a smaller class size is better for both the students and the teacher.  Fewer students, especially at the elementary level, helps teachers keep control of the classroom.  A smaller class also leads to a potential increase in time the teacher can spend helping each individual student.  With too many students in a classroom, the effects of a cramped space can have negative effects on student outcome.5  Over the past 15 years, the student/teacher ratio has declined as figure 8 illustrates.

Historically, Georgia’s student/teacher ratio has been at the national average or slightly below.  Figure 9 captures the trend since 2006.  Following the budget cuts of 2009 and 2010, fewer teachers were being hired than before the recession and budget strapped districts began reducing the number of teachers they employed.  This led to an increase in the student/teacher ratio and a decrease in the teacher/administrator ratio.   

As enrollment rates continue to climb, policymakers and education leaders try to attract the best and brightest to the teaching field.  Alternative routes to certification have played a large role in increasing the number of teachers nationwide.  Almost 500,000 teachers have entered the profession via alternative routes since the mid-1980s.6  Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia provide at least one alternative route to certification, with only Alaska and Oregon not participating. In the 1998-99 school year, over 12,000 teachers were certified by alternative methods nationwide; in 2008-09, that number was 59,000.7  There are many other programs that are at the local and state level, but most have similar characteristics:  

  • Routes specifically designed to recruit, prepare and license talented individuals who already had at least a bachelor’s degree -- and often other careers – in fields other than education.
  • Rigorous screening processes, such as passing tests, interviews, and demonstrated mastery of content.
  • Field-based programs.
  • Coursework or equivalent experiences in professional education studies before and while teaching. 
  • Work with mentor teachers and/or other support personnel.
  • High performance standards for completion of the programs.8

While most alternative routes stick to these characteristics, a different version of these alternative programs has cropped up recently:  for profit programs.  This is especially true in Texas, where for-profit and nonprofit programs “produce 40 percent of all new teachers in Texas, according to an analysis of Texas Education Agency data by Ed Fuller, a Penn State University education professor and former University of Texas researcher.”9  These programs are attracting a lot of potential teachers: “Every year since 2007, the two largest companies, A+ Texas Teachers and iteachTEXAS, have produced far more teachers than any other traditional or alternative program.”10  Supporters and critics of these programs alike acknowledge that research into the effectiveness of these for-profit programs is needed.  Currently, anecdotal evidence is the only thing available.  


1 National Education Association Research.“Rankings of the States 2011 and Estimates of School Statistics 2012.” December 2011.

2 National Center for Education Statistic. Fast Facts.

3 National Education Association.  “Rankings and Estimates:  Rankings of the States 2011 and Estimates of School Statistics 2012.  December, 2011.

4 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010–11 Edition, “Education Administrators."

5 Tanner, C. Kenneth.  “Minimum Classroom Size and Number of Students Per Classroom.”  April, 2000.

6 National Center for Alternative Certification.  “Alternative Teacher Certification:  A State by State Analysis.” 2010.

7 Ibid.

8 National Center for Alternative Certification.  “Alternative Teacher Certification:  A State by State Analysis.” 2010.

9 Smith, Morgan.; Pandolfo, Nick.  “For-Profit, Alternative Teaching Programs Are Booming.” The Texas Tribune.  November 27, 2011.  http://www.texastribune.org/texas-education/public-education/-profit-alternative-teaching-programs-grow-texas/

10 Ibid. 

Research Tells Us

A majority of states, including Georgia, are moving away from No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and embracing new forms of accountability.  The traditional equation that higher pay results from more experience and advanced degrees may eventually be a thing of the past.  In general, research has shown that simply obtaining an advanced degree does not lead to greater student achievement.1  The only caveat to this conclusion was middle school math teachers with advanced subject area degrees, who consistently made a significant impact on student learning.2  Otherwise, other research has found “absolutely no evidence that having a master’s degree improves teacher skills.”3

Research on the impact of experience is more complex.  The first few years of teaching are the most dynamic time for a teacher.  Important gains are made in the first year of teaching, followed by more modest gains the following two years.4  This observation is intuitive because in most professions, once acclimation occurs, best practices are acquired.  Unfortunately, there is scant evidence these improvements continue after three years of teaching.5  Harris and Sass made similar remarks, saying:  “We find that the first few years of experience substantially increase the productivity of elementary and middle school teachers but have little impact on the effectiveness of teachers at the high school level.”6  Methods and data can lead to varying results, because other researchers have concluded that experience continues to have an impact after the first three years.7

As was noted in the Relevancy to Georgia section, National Board Certification (NBC) bonuses are no longer guaranteed in Georgia.  According to some research, this change is justified.  When measuring student test scores, National Board Certified Teachers (NBCTs) were no more effective than non-certified teachers, and there is no evidence that going through the process boosts teacher productivity.8  Interestingly, this statement also had one exception: middle school math teachers.  These are controversial conclusions.  Prior research showed that NBC does add human capital to teachers and make them more productive.9  Another viewpoint proffers that NBC is good at identifying great teachers, but doesn’t produce great teachers.10  Further study is necessary to draw firm conclusions about NBC.

These new accountability measures seek to identify the best teachers and schools, but they do not explain how schools can attract and retain more great teachers.  After accountability measures identify the teachers who are succeeding, the first step is to retain these great teachers.  Past studies have found that lack of support is one of the main reasons teachers leave the profession within three years.11  Smith and Ingersoll identified several steps that could achieve this goal:  having a mentor from the same field, having common planning time with other teachers in the same subject, and collaboration with other teachers on instruction.12  The collaboration between teachers may be the linchpin for retaining teachers.  Becoming part of a group and developing relationships based on a mutual respect and a shared goal of helping students learn is what makes a successful induction program.13  The body of research is explicit; induction and mentoring reduce the rate of turnover.

Even if retention is improved, many school systems are still lacking effective teachers.  Alternative certification routes can bridge this gap.  Except for English education majors who teach middle school reading, teachers with a degree in a non-education discipline are just as effective as traditional route teachers with an education degree.14  In fact, Sass found that alternatively certified teachers have stronger pre-service academic skills, as evidenced by higher initial pass rates on certification exams and higher college entrance exam scores than traditionally prepared teachers.”15  Alternative certification does have its critics—who believe that the process is lax and not as successful as billed.16

Policymakers can enact sweeping reforms, but it is up to school leadership to make it work.  Principals take their cue from superintendents, and must create a school environment that is conducive to excellent teaching.  If at any point this structure breaks down, improvement may not occur.  School and district leadership are what take the reform ideas and turn them into increased student outcomes.17  Second only to classroom instruction, leadership has the greatest impact on the quality and amount that students learn at school.  In schools where student achievement is struggling, school leadership can have the greatest impact.18  This isn’t to say that administrators are the only people who can “lead.”  Research shows that student performance increases greatly when principals share the responsibility of leadership with teachers.19  Having multiple voices included in the process of running a school is imperative.  These stakeholders are not limited to teachers, but students and parents as well.20

 


1 Harris, Douglas N.; Sass, Tim R. “Teacher Training, Teacher Quality,and Student Achievement.” National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.  March 2007.

2 Ibid.

3 Rivkin, Steven G.; Hanushek, Eric A.; Kain, John F. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement. ”Enonometrica. Vol. 73, No. 2.  March, 2005.

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid.

6 Harris, Douglas N.; Sass, Tim R.  “Teacher Training,Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement. ”National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.  March 2007.

7 Clotfelter, Charles T.; Ladd, Helen F.; Vigdor, Jacob L.  “How and Why Do Teacher Credentials Matter For Student Achievement?” National Bureau of Economic Research. January, 2007.

8 Harris, Douglas N.; Sass, Tim R. “The Effects of NBPTS-CertifiedTeachers on StudentAchievement.” National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. March, 2007.

9 Goldhaber, Dan; Anthony, Emily.  “Can Teacher Quality Be Effectively Assessed?”  Urban Institute. March, 2004.  

10 Clotfelter, Charles T.; Ladd, Helen F.; Vigdor, Jacob L.  “How and Why Do Teacher Credentials Matter For Student Achievement?” National Bureau of Economic Research. January, 2007.

11 Brighton, C. M. 1999. Keeping good teachers: Learning from novices. In A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers, ed. M. Scherer, 197-301. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

12 Smith, Thomas M.; Ingersoll, Richard M.  “What Are the Effects of Induction and Mentoring on Beginning Teacher Turnover?”  American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 41, No. 3. Autumn, 2004.

13 Wong, Harry K.  “Induction Programs That Keep New Teachers Teaching and Improving.” NASSP Bulletin Vol. 88, No. 638. March, 2004.

14 Harris, Douglas N.; Sass, Tim R. “Teacher Training,Teacher Quality,and StudentAchievement.” National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.  March 2007.

15 Sass, Tim R.  “Certification Requirements and Teacher Quality:  A Comparison of Alternative Routes To Teaching.”  December, 2011.

16 Heilig, Julian Vasquez.  “Teacher For America:  A Review of the Evidence.”  June, 2010.

17 Leithwood, Kenneth; Louis, Karen Seashore; Anderson, Stephen; Wahlstrom, Kyla.“How Leadership Influences Student Learning.” 2004.

18 Ibid.

19 Louis, Karen Seashore; Leithwood, Kenneth; et al.  “Learning from Leadership:  Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning.”  March, 2010.

20 Ibid.

Latest News

Chicago's Teachers Go on Strike- Associated Press

Mayor Rahm Emanuel is trying to negotiate with the union bosses to keep the strike from being prolonged, but no progress has been made yet. Even as Emanuel asks for concessions due to a looming $700 million shortfall, he still offered 16% raises over the next four years. This doesn't appear to be the sticking point though, as most conflict arose from the inclusion of teacher evaluation models. (September 2012) Related article: A look at the controversial teacher evaluation reform in Chicago. UPDATE: Strike over after seven days.

Rethinking Principal Evaluation- National Association of Elementary School Principals

This report focuses on how best to hold principals accountable. They strongly warn against using only standardized tests to evaluate job performance. Six key areas of focus are recommended in terms of evaluating principals: professional growth and learning, student growth and achievement, school planning and progress, school culture, professional leadership, and stakeholder support and engagement. (September 2012)

A Closer Look at Teacher Leave Benefits: An Apples to Apples Comparison- National Council on Teacher Quality

This report digs into what factors make up the leave policies that school districts create. Different policies come with different costs--some of them hidden. (August 2012)

Rethinking Teacher Compensation- Ed Week

This article notes that the best teachers in the best school systems in the world come from the top third of the college graduation class. This leads the authors to argue that it is imperative to attract these top students into the education field. (August 2012)

Expanding the Impact of Excellent Teachers- Ed Week

This commentary addresses how the authors believe excellent teahers can be better utilized. One interesting suggestion is to allow excellent elementary teachers to specialize in their best subject and have them teach 2 or 4 times as many students, while having paraprofessioals pick up the slack during recess and other instructional times. Follow the link above to read their other provacative ideas. (August 2012)

Can Teacher Evaluation Improve Teaching? -Educationnext

This report asserts that teacher observation is not prevalent enough, and that it is a tool that should be used to help teachers improve their craft. They examine a study done in Cincinatti which concludeds that student achievement was higher in teachers' classrooms after there evaluation than before it. (August 2012)

Can Value-Added Be Applied to Teacher Preparation? Scholars Weigh In- Ed Week

This article collects and summarizes four studies that try to answer this question. There still is no definitive answer, but these studies provide a wealth of information. (August 2012)

Feeling the Heat, AFT's Reform Resolve Wavers- Ed Week

The American Federation of Teachers biennial convention was laced with frustration with the current climate surrounding teachers' unions. There is internal debate about how certain reforms and accountability standards will hinder unions as a whole. (August 2012)

The Irreplaceables: Understanding the Real Retention Crisis in America's Urban Schools-The New Teacher Project

One of the major problems in urban schools is the inability to attract and keep stellar teachers. This report analyzes why these teachers tend to leave these schools, and what steps policy-makers can take to encourage them to stay. One major problem this report identifies is the lack of recognition schools give to their best teachers. (July 2012)

Pay Teachers More: Financial Planning for Reach Models- Opportunity Culture

Does the idea of paying teachers more while keeping class sizes and budgets the same sound impossible? This report highlights several methods that could do just that. Explore these policy proposals to see if this could become reality. (July 2012)

To Earn Classroom Certification, More Teaching and Less Testing- NYT

Washington and Minnesota are among several states to include new requirements of teachers who wish to be certified. Policy-makers are attempting to de-emphasize tests and introduce lesson plan and homework assignments, as well as video tape recordings of interactions with students. (July 2012)

As Membership Plummets, NEA Retools Mission- Ed Week

Membership and dues have dropped at the National Education Association. NEA leaders are concerned because their political power has been diminished. Some of this is from state level policy changes that allow teachers to opt out of membership. This article looks at the future of the NEA. (July 2012)

Substitute Teaching Undergoes New Scrutiny- Ed Week

Are substitutes able to effectively teach a class, or is it simply a day where a movie is shown or busy work is handed out? Some studies show a relationship between days missed by the teacher and lower than expected student performance. This has led some to call for stricter  requirements for substitute teachers. (July 2012)

Building and Sustaining Talent: Creating Conditions in High-Poverty Schools That Support Effective Teaching and Learning- The Education Trust

This study looks at five different school districts that are creating a teaching environment that educators are drawn to. Contrary to popular belief, teacher dissatisfaction and attrition are not primarily caused by unruly students, but due to poor school leadership and staff cohesion, the authors argue. (June 2012)

Do Value-Added Models Accurately Gauge Teacher Performance?-National Education Policy Center

The National Education Policy Center just released their analysis of the Los Angeles school system's test-based teacher evaluation system--the second year results have been recorded. NEPC acknowledges that methodological improvements have been made since the previous year, but major shortcomings still exist which make it unreliable as a way of assessing teachers. The LA Times gives readers the ability to look up teachers' ratings. Incidentally, the state of New York is considering making their teacher rankings available to the public, while the teachers' unions are adamantly opposed. (June 2012) UPDATE: New York Governor Andrew Cuomo sides with teachers' unions and keeps teacher evaluation data anonymous.

 Teachers' Group Submits Petition For Public Vote on Daugaard Education Plan- Rapid City Journal

There will be a referendum in November in South Dakota on the recent education legislation that was passed by the Republican legislature and signed by Governor Dennis Daugaard. Many were upset at the inclusion of measures allowing local school districts to change the way they award tenure and bonuses to teachers. (June 2012)

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's Victory Deals Blow to Unions- Washington Post

In 2011 Gov. Scott Walker and Wisconsin Republicans moved to reform the way government unions are run in the state.  This included increased pension and healthcare contributions by employees, an end to collective bargaining, and the ending of mandatory due payments, among other changes.  Teachers and most other public employees would be affected by this reform effort. In an attempt to reverse this legislative action, Walker was forced into a runoff election--where he prevailed Tuesday June 5th, 53% to 46%. (June 2012)

Hawaii Looks to Bring in New Principals- Honolulu Star Advertiser

Hawaii schools will relax requirements for Vice Principal positions in an attempt to bring in a mix of talented leaders. (May 2012)

The Ripple Effect-A Synthesis of Research on Principal Influence to Inform Performance Evaluation Design-American Institutes for Research

This brief draws upon research literature on principal effectiveness and policy documents created by scholars and national organizations concerned with principal professional practice and its effects.  Relating Story.  (May 2012)

Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century Lessons from Around the World-OECD

This evaluates education systems around the world, identifies the best ways to improve the quality of teaching, provides available research about what can make educational reforms effective, and highlights examples of reforms. (April 2012)

Superintendent Award Winners Discuss Their Success-eSchool News

Several superintendents from across the country were recently honored as strong educational leaders. Interviews with each highlight their successes and offer many leadership best practices. (April 2012)

The Characteristics and Experiences of Beginning Teachers in Seven Northeast and Islands Region States and Nationally-Institute of Education Services

The study focuses on variables related to teachers' preparation and workplace supports that research suggests might be associated with their perceptions of preparedness, effectiveness and retention. (March 2012)

Estimating the Effect of Leaders on Public Sector Productivity: The Case of School Principals-National Bureau of Economic Research

Using data on 7,429 principals from the Texas Schools Project at the University of Texas, Dallas, researchers set out to determine what characterizes the most effective school leaders, and how much of their school's success can be attributed to them (Fee for this report). Relating story. (March 2012)

Successful Principals Speak Out-Mass Insight Education - Turn Around Brief

This brief from Mass Insight Education's School Turnaround Group (STG) provides feedback from a network of leadering pricipals on what they need from their school districts to successfully turn around low-performing schools. (March 2012)

Putting Students on the Path to Learning - The Case for Fully Guided Instruction-American Educator (Spring 2012)

The authors find that decades of research clearly demonstrate that for novices (virtually all students), direct, explicit instruction is more effective and efficient than partial guidance. Teachers should provide explicit direction accompanied by practice and feedback. (March 2012)

How Teacher Turnover Harms Student Achievement-National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research

This study concludes when teachers leave schools, overall morale appears to suffer enough that student achievement declines - both for those taught by the departed teachers and by students whose teachers stayed put. Relating article. (March 2012

28th Annual Survey of the American Teacher-MetLife Foundation

The survey examines the views of teachers, parents and students about the teaching profession, parent and community engagement, and effects of the economy on teaching and learning in schools. Relating story. (March 2012)

Parent-Teacher Home Visits-National Education Association Foundation

This brief presents a model for parent-teacher home visits based on the experience of Seattle, Washington and Springfield, Massachusetts, two of the Foundation's Closing the Achievement Gaps Initiative sites. (March 2012)

Evaluating Teacher Evaluations-Phi Delta Kappan

Popular modes of evaluating teachers are fraught with inaccuracies and inconsistencies, but the field has identified better approaches. (March 2012)

Review of State Policies on Teacher Induction-New Teacher Center

Built upon 10 critical policy criteria, this paper highlights leading state policies and offers policy recommendations to encourage the design and implementation of comprehensive, high-quality inducation and mentoring programs. Relating story. (February 2012)

Rating Your Teaching Team-Harvard Education Letter

Schools are now playing catch-up in the world of teaming, but just putting teachers into teams doesn’t always yield the hoped-for outcomes. (December 2011)

Assessing the Compensation of Public School Teachers-The Heritage Center for Data Analysis

The teaching profession is crucial to America’s society and economy, but public-school teachers should receive compensation that is neither higher nor lower than market rates. Relating story. (November 2011)

What's Missing from the Debate on Seniority?-Annenberg Institute for School Reform

The role of seniority in teacher laoyoffs is a perennial subject of intense debate, with different states taking sharply different approaches. (October 2011)

Implementation of the Natonal School Administration Manager (SAM) Innovation Project: Comparison of Project Designs-The Wallace Foundation

What would you do with an extra day every week? This new evalation of SAM process provides interesting reading. (October 2011)

Blame Game: Let's Talk Honestly About Bad Teachers-Time Magazine

Removing the lowest performing educators would pay big dividends, but saying so invites charges of "teacher bashing." (October 2011)

Stayers and Leavers - Early-Career Teacher Effectiveness and Attrition-Educational Researcher

In this study of novice teachers in North Carolina public schools, the authors investigated the development of teachers’ effectiveness during their first five years in the classroom and contrasted the effectiveness of teachers who stayed with that of those who left. (October 2011)

NOTE: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution devoted its Sunday, September 25, 2011 editorial page to teacher quality. Following is that lead editorial as well as commentary from three Georgia teachers:

Educators' next chapter-Atlanta Journal-Constiution

Great schools demand great teachers. And in recent years, Georgia has spent billions of dollars, in fits and starts, to increase teacher quality. Yet, we are not where we need to be. (September 2011)

The Same Starting Line - How School Boards Can Erase the Opportunity Gap Between Poor and Middle-Class Children-Appleseed/Georgia Appleseed

Each day children in poverty attend schools whose resources are disparate from those found in schools in more affluent areas of a district. There's a better way. (September 2011

Newcomers need more support-Atlanta Journal-Constitution

I have observed many first-year teachers enter the workforce. Often these novice teachers are given the most challenging students. (September 2011)

Develop a relevant measure-Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Today's kindergartners will begin retiring in the year 2061. Teachers have no idea what the world will look like in five years, much less 50, yet we're tasked with preparing students for life in that world. (September 2011)

Raise GPA, required standards-Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The best attainable and realistic way to improve teacher quality is simple: raise the qualifications for teachers entering the classroom. (September 2011)

The Missing Link in School Reform-Stanford Social Innovation Review

In trying to improve American public schools, educators, policymakers, and philanthropists are overselling the role of the highly skilled individual teacher and undervaluing the benefits that come with teacher collaborations. Related story. (September 2011)

Profile of Teachers in the U.S. 2011-National Center for Education Information

This survey/report finds that an influx of individuals from non-traditional backgrounds and entering the profession through non-traditional programs has altered the teaching force. (August 2011)

Designing Principal Evaluation Systems: Research to Guide Decision Making-American Institute for Research

This is a summary of current research on the condition of principal evaluation systems and the relationship between principal evaluation and principals’ capacity to lead learning communities. Relating story. (August 2011)

Ten things every new teacher should know-eSchool News

In today's often volatile teaching environment, and with expectations heightened, it's critical to be prepared. In a recent Question of the Week, we asked readers: "What's the one thing you wish your education professors had told you about teaching or classroom management?" (August 2011)

The State of Learning Disabilities-National Center for Learning Disabilities

Effective teaching makes a huge difference in student learning, but this new study finds that only 60 percent of students with learning disabilities have a general education teacher who's received specialized training to support the instruction of these students. (August 2011)

Four Steps to Staying Sane As a Teacher-Education Week Teacher

Dear Young Teacher: I'd like to avoid telling you to listen to your heart. (August 2011)

Professional Development for Teachers - What Two Rigorous Studies Tell Us-MDRC

This report synthesizes research from two recent studies on teacher professional development, one in reading and one in math, each of which shows the interventions were substantially less effective than had been hoped (PEN). (August 2011)

Why Digital Learning Will Liberate Teachers-Education Next

I spend a lot of time writing about how digital learning can transform our education system into a student-centric one. (August 2011)

Teacher Effects in Early Grades: Evidence from a Randomized Study-Spyros Konstantopoulus

This study examines the enduring benefits of teacher effects on student achievement in early elementary grades using high quality experimental data from Project STAR. Related Story. (August 2011)

New Teachers: Are You in It for the Long Haul?-Education Week - Teacher Magazine

Welcome, newbies, to the wonderful world of education. You are now embarked upon that career for which you've been preparing for so long. (July 2011)

Student Teaching in the United States-National Council on Teaching Quality

This study looked at 134 student-teaching programs nationwide and found that three-quarters of them did not meet five basic standards for high quality. Related Story. (July 2011)

Kelly Stopp's Sunset Stories program brings home the parent-child experience of reading-Milken Family Foundation

To encourage more reading, Stopp and her partners bring families with children ranging from babies to fourth graders together at 6:30 p.m. for what they call Sunset Stories (tagline: "A story read just before bed"). (July 2011)

Critical Contributions: Philanthropic Investment in Teachers and Teaching-University of Georgia - Kronley & Associates

This report analyzes historical and contemporary trends in philanthropic investment in teacher quality. (July 2011)

A Modem for Success-Milken Family Foundation - Connections

Who says it ain't easy being green? Kristen Drake (GA '06) first began exploring the world of online lectures with her own website in 2000, eventually adding assignments and quizzes for varying grade levels and subjects. (July 2011)

Not a Part-Time Job-Education Week - Teacher

Everyone thinks they know what it takes to be a teacher. Nearly all Americans have had first-hand experience being in a classroom for many years—as students. But teaching is so much more than what the public sees (or thinks they see). (May 2011)

Passing Muster: Evaluating the Teacher Evaluation Systems-Brookings

Although much of the impetus for new approaches to teacher evaluation comes from policymakers at the state and national levels, the design of any particular teacher evaluation system falls to the roughly 16,000 school districts and 5,000 independent public charter schools in the country. (May 2011)

2011 Teacher of the Year Talks About Reform and More-Washington Post

This year's top national teacher is a chemistry teacher from Maryland who has taught at the Maryland School for the Deaf. Read this question and answer session with her. (May 2011)

Kindergarten teachers find success in block scheduling-Columbia Times

Kindergarten teachers at Grovetown Elementary School this school year discovered a better way to instruct pupils through a method of block scheduling. (May 2011)

Colorado State Council for Teacher Effectiveness

The council has created a definition of an effective educator, as was required by state law. The definition consists of six quality standards, including showing content knowledge, demonstrating leadership and taking responsibility for student growth. (April 2011)

Toward Increasing Teacher Diversity: Targeting and Intervention for Teacher Licensure Candidates-Educational Testing Service and National Education Association

This report focuses on the performance gap between White and minority teacher candidates and offers insight into possible strategies and interventions that can be employed to narrow the gap and better support minority candidates in meeting full licensure requirements. (April 2011)

What Does Washington State Get for Its Investment in Bonuses for Board Certified Teachers?-Center on Reinventing Public Education

Washington State is set to spend nearly $100 million in the next two years on pay bonuses for teachers who receive national board certification. This investment is supposed to improve the state's teaching force and encourage the most capable teachers to work in high-poverty schools. Does it accomplish those goals? (April 2011)

MetLife Survey of the American Teacher-MetLife

This report, conducted by Harris Interactive, each year since 1984, explores teacher's opinions and brings them to the attention of educators, policy makers and the public. (March 2011)

Toward Increasing Teacher Diversity: Targeting Support and Intervention for Teacher Licensure Candidates-Educational Testing Service

Minority teachers tend to take licensing exams later in their academic or professional careers than their white peers, which could partly explain their lower test scores and passing rates. Related article. (March 2011)

The Extent of Late-Hiring and its Relationship with Teacher Turnover: Evidence from Michigan-Abstract - Northwestern and Michigan Univ. Professors

Teachers hired after the start of the school year are twice as likely to leave their schools - or the profession altogether - within a year, leading to higher staffing costs. (March 2011)

What the U.S. Can Learn from Some of the World's Most Successful Education Reform Efforts-McGraw Hill Research Foundation

Compared with more than 70 economies worldwide, America's high school students continue to rank only average in reading and science, and below average in math. But this sorry record for a wealthy nation can be broken if the US focuses on recruiting and keeping first-rate teachers (March 2011)

Teacher and Leader Effectiveness in High Performing Education Systems-Alliance for Excellent Education and Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education

This report examines highly effective lessons from education systems that develop and support teachers and leaders in Finland, Ontario, and Singapore. (March 2011)

Study: $75 million teacher pay incentive did not improve achievement-Gotham Schools

New York City’s heralded $75 million experiment in teacher incentive pay — deemed “transcendent” when it was announced in 2007 — did not increase student achievement at all, a new study by the Harvard economist Roland Fryer concludes. (March 2011)

Ten great sites with free teacher resources-eSchool News

With cuts to school budgets, teachers are often left searching for ways to innovate without breaking the bank. (February 2011)

Education Leadership for the 21st Century-The Arthur M. Blank Family Foundation - Speaker Series

This panel discussion focused on the pros and cons of elected school boards, mayoral control of schools and other governance models. Click on "Speaker Series" tab. (February 2011)

A Measured Approach to Teacher Education-Education Sector

Over the next five years more than a million new teachers will enter U.S. classrooms. Are our teacher prep programs doing the job? This report takes a look. (January 2011)

Status of Professional Learning-Learning Forward

Launched in 2008 by NSDC and a team of researchers from the Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education (SCOPE), the three-part Status of Professional Learning research study aims to measure the effectiveness of professional learning in the United States. (January 2011)

For More Information

Center for Teaching Quality – http://teachingquality.org

The Center for Teaching Quality seeks to improve student learning and advance the teaching profession by cultivating teacher leadership, conducting research, and crafting policy. 

 

Georgia Professional Standards Commission – www.gapsc.com

The Georgia Professional Standards Commission (GAPSC) assumes full responsibility for the certification, preparation, and conduct of personnel in Georgia’s public schools.

 

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards – www.nbpts.org

The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) seeks to advance the quality of teaching and learning by developing professional standards for accomplished teachers, creating a voluntary system to certify teachers who meet those standards, and ultimately utilize the expertise of these teachers to improve education.

Printable Document

For a printable pdf version of this information, click here.

270 Peachtree Street, Suite 2000, Atlanta, GA, 30303, 404-223-2280